Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-18 13:43:58 EDT --- rpmlint *.rpm geany-plugins.x86_64: E: no-binary --> That's fine, metapackage. geany-plugins.x86_64: W: no-documentation --> Fine, metapackage. geany-plugins-common.x86_64: W: no-documentation 13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I would recommend calling the subpackages %{name}-foo (i.e. geany-plugins-foo) rather than geany-plugin-foo for consistency with other plugin bundles (eg. claws-mail-plugins-*). For the geany-plugins metapackage to serve any purpose you need to add Requires: %{name}-geanyvc %{name}-geanygdb %{name}-addons %{name}-geanylatex %{name}-geanylipsum %{name}-geanylua %{name}-geanysendmail %{name}-shiftcolumn %{name}-spellcheck -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review