[Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050





--- Comment #15 from W. Michael Petullo <mike@xxxxxxxx>  2009-07-17 19:57:07 EDT ---
Regarding reopening #511387, that's fine. I pushed hard for a while to get this
in Fedora. In fact, I wrote the original autotools patch and helped the
upstream maintainer with autotools before he integrated the patch for 0.7. That
being said, I do not have a good solution to the issues raised on the
fedora-packaging mailing list; see:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-February/msg00047.html

especially:

> Unrelated to this, libcgi maintainer should not have chosen to use libcgi.so.1 as the 
> soname without upstream's approval.
    -- Mr. Mierzejewski (later in this mail thread)

Progress was stuck because 1) I don't think that we should ship a shared
library name that is different that what upstream intends 2) we can't have two
packages with the same shared library name and 3) I did not feel like asking
the developer to rename his project due to one distribution's preferences.

I'd like to see cgilib packaged. I just did not have the time to work through
this. I did invest a lot of time to get my autotools work in, so I would like
to cgilib in Fedora eventually.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]