[Bug 192418] Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xbae - Xbae widget set


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192418


jamatos@xxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jamatos@xxxxxxxx  2006-09-09 06:09 EST -------
Ah, I see now. What I did not notice the first time is that Xbae is a 
capitalized version of xbae. That is why it was weird. You could add a comment 
there saying this, it is easier to understand that way.

* there are no duplicates in %files and all the directories are owned
* scripts are reasonable and according to the rules
* there are no static libraries
* there are no language specific files
* there is no need for a desktop file
* follows the packaging guidelines

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]