Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510979 --- Comment #6 from David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> 2009-07-17 16:42:43 EDT --- My reasoning for approving the name is this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming Says that: When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. The php guidelines not withstanding, php-phpSmug struck me as unnecessary duplication and the same with php-phpFlickr. I suppose one could have chosen php-Smug, however that seems to run afoul of the same guideline, where it is supposed to be php-$packagename. In this case packagename is phpSmug. There is precedence for this other places. phplogcon, phpldapadmin (albeit they are standalone applications). Even other languages have similar precedence. PyXML and pywbem being the ones that immediately jumps to mind (though in their defense, Python libraries have no such naming guidance). That said there is also precedent in the other direction - such as: php-pear-PHPUnit and php-xmpphp Smarty was originally a php.net project, and doesn't contain php in the name, so php-Smarty makes sense. My decision could be wrong, so feel free to say so. On the other hand if this makes sense, perhaps I need to send a change draft to FPC for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review