Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #25 from Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-17 12:52:21 EDT --- OK, new files: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz.spec http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/xz-4.999.8-0.7.beta.fc11.src.rpm > Builds fine; rpmlint says: > xz.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary XZ > Generally I'd just suggest dropping "XZ Utils" from the summary, but it's not a > big deal. Fixed. > xz.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.9999.8-0.6.beta > ['4.999.8-0.6.beta.fc12', '4.999.8-0.6.beta'] > There's an extra '9' in the changelog entry. Fixed. > There's a test suite present. I tried it and it fails utterly, though it > passes when I build the package locally. I suspect this is related to the > rpath issues, so I went with the following: > %check > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/src/liblzma/.libs make check > and it worked fine. I think it's a good idea the test suite if at all > possible, and it seems possible. Added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review