Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-17 08:27:23 EDT --- rpmlint output: e2fsprogs.src: W: strange-permission uuidd.init 0755 e2fsprogs.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes e4fsprogs e2fsprogs.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides e4fsprogs e2fsprogs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - I suggest enabling the e4fsprogs obsolete only when building on RHEL, i.e. %if 0%{?rhel} > 0 Obsoletes: e4fsprogs < %{version}-%{release} Provides: e4fsprogs = %{version}-%{release} %endif - I'd break the requires line in two due to the versioning. Requires: e2fsprogs-libs = %{version}-%{release}, device-mapper - Is the Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig really necessary since ldconfig is part of glibc? - Change Requires: /sbin/install-info to Requires: info as info provides install-info on all distributions, at least from RHEL 4 onwards. - libuuid-devel needs to Provides: libuuid-static = %{version}-%{release} - libdss-devel needs to Provides: libdss-static = %{version}-%{release} - libcom_err-devel needs to Provides: libcom_err-static = %{version}-%{release} - -devel needs to Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release} - Summary of -libs is incorrect: Summary: Ext2/3/4 filesystem-specific shared libraries and headers (no headers are present) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review