Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510533 Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(jochen@herr-schmi | |tt.de) --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-17 05:44:32 EDT --- Ok, running down the list of failures. It's building in ix86, which is good. The %description section still contains the minor grammatical issues i pointed out. This isn't a blocker, but please fix it at some point. [yankee@koan ghc-editline]$ rpmlint -v ghc-editline*0.2.1.0-2*rpm ghc-editline.src: I: checking ghc-editline.src: I: checking ghc-editline-devel.i586: I: checking ghc-editline-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-editline-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-editline-doc.i586: I: checking ghc-editline-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-editline-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-editline-prof.i586: I: checking ghc-editline-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-prof.i586: W: no-documentation ghc-editline-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/editline-0.2.1.0/libHSeditline-0.2.1.0_p.a ghc-editline-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-editline-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation ghc-editline-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/editline-0.2.1.0/libHSeditline-0.2.1.0_p.a ghc-editline-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-editline-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-editline-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/editline-0.2.1.0/libHSeditline-0.2.1.0_p.a 11 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. Resolution: PASS Thanks for the submission! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review