Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512106 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-17 05:05:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > BuildRoot used is archaic. Use > It was one of recommended in Guideliness. But if you insist on the most > prefered... Changed. It was missing at least %{release}. > > I still don't see why you would want to use "/usr/bin/docbook2man" instead of > "docbook2man" > I prefer full paths as it prevent path spoofing. Just my opinion. I'm not > dogmatic about it. Changed. But that shouldn't be an issue with the build system. > > License is GPLv2 not GPLv3. (Source code header is binding.) > Since I'm upstrem, then what I want is binding :) > Changed source header to GPLv3. Mention of GPLv2 was mistake. OK. ** The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review