[Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875





--- Comment #6 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-16 19:02:24 EDT ---
One of the developers directed me to a newer version of the code here:
  http://code.google.com/p/libdasm/
which is more actively maintained; the last commit was May 17th of this year. 
I'd want to include this version.

Unfortunately the licensing there still appears ambiguous:
the "Code license" field reads "New BSD License", which is fair enough, but the
"Labels" field has the label "publicdomain", and the description says "public
domain".  The files still contain copyright claims.

The original author appears to be happy to license the code under a BSD-style
license (private email), and believes the other contributors would be as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]