Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510626 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-16 14:21:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Those directories are owned by sugar. Fine. > Why do we want the install change? I can't see any other Fedora packages which > do this. There are lots of packages with make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps In fact, every package that installs stuff that did not get compiled should have it. The reason for this is that we support multiarch systems in Fedora, where you can install both a 32 bit and 64 bit version of a package. rpm will allow a file to be owned be multiple packages as long as size and timestamp match - otherwise the packages will conflict. Since the XO is not multilib, this is a minor issue, no need for a rebuild, but you can fix it in the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review