[Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658





--- Comment #4 from Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-15 21:39:41 EDT ---
I'll admit I wasn't entirely clear on the licensing.  The C source file says:

 * By: David J. Schwartz
 * <davids@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 * Version 1.03
 *
 * Put into the public domain. Please keep the acknowledgement above
 * intact. Portions taken from the NTP source (the time_shm structure
 * and attach_shm code) are covered by the NTP copyright/license

Does including a structure and one function mean the whole thing falls under
the NTP license (I looked at the NTP source and that file is MIT licensed)?  I
wasn't sure; that's why I left it as claimed above (but I'm not a lawyer and I
suspect the above author is not either).

I'll get the other things cleaned up pending a licensing review.  How does this
look for a description:

===
Shared memory (SHM) driver to allow high-resolution pulse-per-second
(PPS) time sources to be used with a Network Time Protocol (NTP) server
without a PPS-enabled kernel.  The PPS pin of the time source must be 
connected to the declared signal pin on a serial or parallel port.

See /etc/sysconfig/shmpps for configuration.
===

And yes, I need to get more involved in the reviews (haven't done one yet).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]