Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-15 14:04:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. spec guidelines-conformant > 2. fontconfig snippet from our templates > 3. legal already reviewed > > ϯϯϯ APPROVED ϯϯϯ > > The fontconfig prio should probalby be 64 as it's mainly a LGC font. You're > right to use a high number, however, as it's not really general-purpose. > > Also, the description and summary on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/APA_New_Athena_Unicode_fonts > > are probably cleaner. “Freeware” is going to annoy a lot of people if you keep > it. > > As usual you can continue from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a > > Thank you for packaging so many fonts for Fedora! continuing from cvs request etc. corrected spec as per your comment: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/athena/apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/athena/apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/athena/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review