Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #26 from Alexander Boström <abo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-15 09:19:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Hmm, you're right. A subpackage would be fine. Another option is to just put > > anyterm.conf in %doc since it asks to be edited anyway. > > I created a anyterm-httpd subpackage, that depends on anyterm and httpd, and > just contains the anyterm / httpd proxy config. Cool, though there's * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. It's only a SHOULD. I don't know if it matters. > Done, useradd and groupadd no longer redirected stderr. Good enough, though the redirect of stdout for those seems superfluous. Also, some new rpmlints: anyterm.src:111: E: files-attr-not-set I think you need a defattr for each subpackage. anyterm.src:120: W: macro-in-%changelog doc Edit the changelog to say %%doc. anyterm-httpd.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized httpd proxy configuration for anyterm It seem wrong to capitalize a package name. anyterm-httpd.i586: W: no-documentation There's not much documentation to include. It's all on the web site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review