Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510969 --- Comment #41 from MERCIER Jonathan <bioinfornatics@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-14 13:48:05 EDT --- Spec file: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SPECS/valide.spec SRC.RPM file: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/SRPMS/valide-0.5.1-0.10.20090713svn278.fc11.src.rpm ____________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/valide-0.5.1-0.10.20090713svn278.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ____________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/valide-* valide.x86_64: E: devel-dependency vala-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. valide.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.1-0.10.svn27820090713 ['0.5.1-0.10.20090713svn278.fc11', '0.5.1-0.10.20090713svn278'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. valide.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/valide/licenses/None valide-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. _________________________________________________________ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review