Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #14 from Dan Kelley <kelley.dan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-14 06:48:04 EDT --- Do I infer correctly, from the comments of D Haley, that declaring it GPLv2+ in a few spots can let me make the change without altering each and every source file? That would be wonderful, because altering the source files has a bit of a negative effect. (The modification date is a useful thing, in indicating at a glance which parts of a code have been reworked, and which worked from the start. I'm a scientist, and I trust 1960s fortran subroutines more than months-old c++.) I would love to get a clear statement on what I should do. I am hoping, from D Haley's comment, that I may satisfy Fedora's needs by modifying just a few files ... but which ones? (I have modified my gri.spec, but I don't know if that's being used by Fedora, actually.) PS. I know I'm being a nuisance on this, but I do think it is better for me to use my time on the code, rather than on reading documents about licenses. PPS. Gri is quit old, which explains why I say "GPL" in some places ... that's all there was, once upon a time! Dan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review