Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507943 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-14 05:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > > OK, I'll update it when its in the packaging guidelines. I don't see that it > > > should block the review as I only see it there when copying files within the > > > install section. The only one that does that is the utf-8 stuff which preserves > > > it as per the details you provided above. > > > > The purpose is to have the same time stamps on files that are not architecture > > specific in order to avoid trouble with multilib/multiarch packages. Adding the > > INSTALL="install -p" doesn't harm anything. > > > > I guess I can't flunk this review on that grounds, so the package is > > Thanks. That makes sense (and is good to know) for noarch packages. I'll add it > to my notes :-) Not really, more for -devel packages that exist e.g. on both i386 and x86_64 and the two can be installed in the same time. (They contain both architecture independent headers and architecture dependent libraries.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review