[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164


Bobby Powers <bobby@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bobby@xxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #38 from Bobby Powers <bobby@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-13 16:20:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > What about the IIOP license (comment #23)?  
> 
> Ehh, that one is non-free too. :(
> 
> Turns out Red Hat Legal thinks the Unicode license is also non-free. So, three
> license problems.  

Is there anything I could do to help?  I just recently started a project using
ACE, and it would be very nice to have it in the main Fedora repositories.  I
don't have many contacts, but I can develop.  How big of a deal would it be to
replace or modify the non-Sun (hoping they will re-license those) files in
question?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]