[Bug 511081] Review Request: perl-accessors - Create accessor methods in caller's package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511081


Rasmus Ory Nielsen <ron@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen <ron@xxxxxx>  2009-07-13 14:38:41 EDT ---
Package builds fine and rpmlint is silent.

* source files match upstream:
  sha256sum: 3a8db00f38148f3afadbe5330dc5490d9933f9cae137e842ec225a4d3adb2d9f
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
  Note, %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) is
  preferred over the one used, see
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock.
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  perl(accessors) = 1.01
  perl(accessors::chained) = 1.01
  perl(accessors::classic) = 1.01
  perl(accessors::ro) = 1.01
  perl(accessors::rw) = 1.01
  perl-accessors = 1.01-1.fc10
  ---
  perl >= 0:5.006
  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
  perl(base)
  perl(constant)
  perl(strict)
  perl(warnings::register)
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]