Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-12 20:59:49 EDT --- I get the following rpmlint complaints: stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 COLORS stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 stdscr stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 acs_map stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 COLOR_PAIRS stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 newwin stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 waddch stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wmove stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 keypad stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 endwin stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 use_default_colors stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 waddnwstr stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 doupdate stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 delwin stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 werase stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 initscr stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 pair_content stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 nonl stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wvline stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wget_wch stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wrefresh stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 init_pair stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wtimeout stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 cbreak stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 start_color stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wcolor_set stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 whline stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 noecho stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 wbkgdset stfl.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstfl.so.0.21 keyname I guess there's some library that this one isn't linked against, and its expected that anything which will use this library will link it in instead. Is that the case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review