[Bug 510913] Review Request: php-pecl-ncurses - Terminal screen handling and optimization package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510913


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-12 15:28:11 EDT ---
Builds fine; rpmlint is silent.

I have to ask, though I seem to recall that php makes makes it difficult: is it
possible to run the test in the "tests" directory?  I'm pretty sure it's not,
so I don't think it's worth holding this package up waiting for an answer.

I note that your packaging template has changed a bit from the one currently in
the guidelines.  For example, the php_zend_api conditional is missing.  I
understand that for this package it's pointless because you know that PHP will
be new enough, but perhaps it may be work revisiting that guideline page

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:                     
   cf6fdff2f5d7c98f9093bcf1c159721aeff42e5a15607dcd24113a6af517b401
   ncurses-1.0a.0.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.                                                              
* description is OK.                                                          
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   config(php-pecl-ncurses) = 1.0.0-1.fc12
   ncurses.so()(64bit)
   php-ncurses = 5.3.0
   php-pecl(ncurses) = 1.0.0-1.fc12
   php-pecl-ncurses = 1.0.0-1.fc12
   php-pecl-ncurses(x86-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc12
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/pecl
   config(php-pecl-ncurses) = 1.0.0-1.fc12
   libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
   libpanel.so.5()(64bit)
   php(api) = 20041225
   php(zend-abi) = 20060613

? %check is not present, but there seems to be a test suite present.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets are OK (pecl module registration)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]