Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vigra - Generic Programming for Computer Vision https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204975 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kevin@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-07 22:24 EST ------- Thanks for the prelim review Parag. OK - Package name OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ea91f2fb4212a21d708aced277e6e85a vigra1.4.0.tar.gz ea91f2fb4212a21d708aced277e6e85a vigra1.4.0.tar.gz.1 OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. See below - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - -doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - No rpmlint output. SHOULD Items: OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it. OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. Issues: 1. You might change your default attibute lines from: %defattr(-, root, root) to %defattr(-, root, root,-) (To keep directory permissions the same and not use umask) 2. This package appears to be able to use 'boost python'. Might look into submitting boost and boost-python? Neither of those are blockers, you might fix the first before importing. I am happy to APPROVE this package and sponsor you. Note that your other submission was approved, so you should be able to import it as well. Continue from step 6 under (Get a Fedora Account): http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head- a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 If you have any questions at all, feel free to email me or catch me on irc in #fedora-extras (my nick is nirik). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review