Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-11 21:35:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > notes: > > circular dep. problems: > > - pmgZ links against aqua and vice versa - i linked aqua against pmgZ, but pmgZ > > has an undefined non-weak-symbol as a result. > > Maybe you can rebuild the former to get it use the latter library? > That could work, sure. > > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs > > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that reflect > > this. > > > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW. > > Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should be > just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs... Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review