[Bug 509121] Review Request: python-kaa-display - Python API providing Low level support for various displays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509121


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-10 18:24:26 EDT ---
Indeed, this is a simple package which build fine and elicits no complaints
from rpmlint.

I checked the tests; none of them seem to be runnable.  It might be nice to add
a comment about that.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:                       
   72cfe231feae7b860b9e00fb2d83e1cb54f0d38719267a4701818c4c8aa6e922  
   kaa-display-0.1.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.                                                              
* description is OK.                                                          
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   _FBmodule.so()(64bit)
   _SDLmodule.so()(64bit)
   _X11module.so()(64bit)
   python-kaa-display = 0.1.0-1.fc12
   python-kaa-display(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc12
  =
   libImlib2.so.1()(64bit)
   libSDL-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
   libX11.so.6()(64bit)
   libXcomposite.so.1()(64bit)
   libXext.so.6()(64bit)
   libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
   libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
   python(abi) = 2.6

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]