Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-10 15:16:54 EDT --- > You should add openssl-devel as BR, otherwise the package is built without SSL > support. Thank you. Added. > And, if I am not mistaken, your package suffers from the same problem as > described under https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772, it is > built using the internal minilzo instead of the ones made available by > lzo-minilzo Hmmmm. Yes, you are right again. I'm fix it. Now used system variant. (In reply to comment #2) > How is this different from vino? First, main difference - it is not DE related, minimum dependencies. Second... so, I'm not use Gnome at all and even wasn't try vino at all :( But x11vnc provide several advantages: 1) It's easy to start (It was first really working solutions, what I found when search how get access to running X11 session at home computer from work, when only SSH was available) 2) It is uses several useful patches like TurboVNC (VNC is very slow protocol, so, any speed improvements is highly appreciated), tightvnc-filetransfer, lzo and others.(In reply to comment #1) 3) It can be used to provide access not only first running X11 session, but really to any (to which auth files you can get access) 4) It can provide access even before X11 session starts, to GDM/KDM/XDM/CDE login screen for example ( http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/faq.html#faq-display-manager ) It would be great, If you can try and compare its comprehensive. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-3.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1466147 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review