Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #29 from Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> 2009-07-10 10:10:23 EDT --- I asked for some more feedback from the packaging list and so far the best suggestion seems to match your treat it as version 0 suggestion. I think with the possibility that the project will start doing versioned releases in the future and the issue with doing prerelease naming with date based version it's better to go that route. I can still get their date / SVN snapshot number in the Fedora release (once it happens) to make it clear which public build the Fedora release corresponds to. Barring some new information that suggests doing something differently, I'll get another test build up tonight with the above version-release naming scheme as well as using the latest snapshot from the project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review