[Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399


Steven M. Parrish <smparrish@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #9 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-09 19:22:46 EDT ---
Everything looks good here and it built just fine for all archs.  I'll approve
this with one caveat.  Just remove the conflicts: sugar-update-control.  When
you do the initial build go on and apply your patch to s-u-c and do a
chain-build.  this will build a new s-u-c package at this same time so the
conflicts will not be needed.  Don't forget to include s-u-c in your bodhi
request for F11.

Steven

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]