Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-07-08 13:27:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > There are many rpmlint warining/errors on -doc subpackage, however > these are on examples and I think they are safe to ignore. Agreed. * Package named correctly * Macros used consistently * Builds fine in mock * Requires/provides sane * filelist mostly sane (see below) * rpmlint mostly ok (see below) * spec file clean and legible (well, you could improve indentation in %globals paragraph :) Needs work: 1.) Tests failing. According to the comments you seem to be aware of that. Not blocking a review. 2.) Rpmlint rubygem-mkrf.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/cache/mkrf-0.2.3.gem 0600 You probably want to change this via %attr in %files or change the mode in %install or something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review