Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #17 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-07 19:33:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > contacted (out of office until the 14th, apparently) - it seems like building > > dependencies and then using said deps in a binary build in a single spec file > > would be difficult to do - are there any examples of this to go by? > > Doesn't it build them automatically, or do you end up with a static library? > Shipping that would be one option.. > it builds them automatically, then glues them together into one big libapbs.so library. So I could patch the makefiles to not include them in libapbs.so and add the necessary deps to the apbs binary build. Perhaps that would be easiest. > But basically what you need to do is first build the dependency and install it > in the build directory (say, %{_builddir}/aqua) and set the linker and include > paths so that they use the aqua in that directory. > Or this, but I'd still need to patch the makefiles to not include aqua/pmg/etc into libapbs. > In %install you'd then install aqua manually in %{buildroot} alongside with > the normal 'make install' of apbs. OK, I think I have an idea of what to try now. More later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review