Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509798 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-07 09:28:46 EDT --- I'm afraid, that you're wrong - no naming scheme was chosed so far (at least they didn't do it in open manner). Moreover, I suspect that using name "redhat" is not suitable. First - it's a trademark, second - we are building Fedora, not the RHEL. Actually, maybe is it better to change this part to something neutral? I did some checks - here are valid gcc naming schemes: i686-pc-linux-gnu (gcc for F-10, i386) powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for F-11, ppc) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (gcc for x86_64, CentOS 5) armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi (F-10 for ARM on my arm-machine) On the other hand, if we'll add branches for EPEL, then my naming scheme (armv5tel-redhat-linux-gnueabi) will be improper. I'll ask in mail-lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review