Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-06 19:13:15 EDT --- Given the license of the build dependency,(wxWidgets, zlib, libtiff) which all are GPLv3 compatible we will not have a problem to move to GPLv3+ (like if any dependency were GPLv2 only). Now nothing requires us to be GPLv3+ either (exept if we consider COPYING text matter much than source code). Quoting the guidelines, we have to: - Have a license field - If a COPYING is provided, have it bundled. - Consider the binary rpm as the license field. What we don't have to do: - Have license field to match COPYING text. So this ends to be the #3rd choice which is the one of the src.rpm All other fields from the review have been corrected. ----------------------- This package (panoglview) is APPROVED by me ----------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review