Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #28 from Antti Andreimann <antti.andreimann@xxxxxxx> 2009-07-06 17:27:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > > Requires: ace-devel > > I don't think adding a requirement for ACE is a good idea. ACE support is > optional and I would expect only a few people needing this functionality > (binary serialization to ACE CDR streams). Is there something like Suggests: or > Recommends: ? AFAIK there is no "recommended packages" information in RPM files. The dependency is currently commented out because Fedora does not have ACE packages. If they become available, the decision whether to depend on them or not can be made. The current information in the spec file serves only as a reminder to me and other package maintainers to look into the issue when ACE packages become available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review