Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #9 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2009-07-06 15:51:28 EDT --- Thanks for that review! 1. You are absolutely right about the license. The authors specify "GPL >= 3"; so, GPLv3+ must be used (instead of GPLv3). 2. As for the %{packrel} macro, as I now understand, it should be used for the release of the upstream R package (and not the RPM release). The updated specification file and source RPM are to be found at the following URLs: ----------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/3/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/3/R-RM2-0.0-3.fc11.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- As for the package review process, besides a few reviews, I watch almost all the C++-related packages, so as to try to help where there is no other reviewer assigned (it is not that much, but I own quite a few upstream open source projects, which I have to push if I ever want them to reach a critical mass). However, you are right, and I do fully understand that we are never enough to perform peer reviews :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review