Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-06 09:55:10 EDT --- Did some digging here, and found a copy of the original website, which was current at the time of the last release of libnurbs (aka, nurbs++), 3.0.11. http://web.archive.org/web/20021128215257/libnurbs.sourceforge.net/ >From that, it is clear that the author intended nurbs++ to be under the LGPLv2+. Looking at the CVS history, the author appears to have been the only person who has checked in files, so I have no reason to assume that the unlicensed files come from questionable licensing. In addition, most of the unlicensed files are little more than stubs for c++ (e.g. nurbs/f_nurbsS_sp.cpp), the only unlicensed files of any real significance are: numerical/statistic.cpp numerical/chebexp.cpp numerical/integrate.h numerical/fft.cpp Based on that, I think it is safe to assume that all of the unlicensed files are LGPLv2+. So, please fix the license tag to be: License: LGPLv2+ If upstream ever comes back to life, it would still be nice if they fixed the licensing on the unlicensed files (along with the other issues highlighted in the sourceforge ticket), but I won't hold this review up for it. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review