Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-06 09:01:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1456755 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 411d9acf5048e18f7f4dcae647add0c65caee715 CGI-Application-Server-0.061.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=92, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 1.96 cusr 0.23 csys = 2.26 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Server-0.061-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Server) = 0.061 Requires: perl(CGI) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::Static) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review