Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #6 from John Guthrie <guthrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-05 00:42:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post > > section, so they should be ghosted. > > We run ldconfig primarily to update the dynamic linker's cache file. ldconfig > creates the *.so.N symlink, if it isn't present already (or it changes it, if a > newer library version is found). However, the *.so.1 symlink ought to be > included in your package already. If "make install ..." doesn't create it, you > can do it yourself: > > %install > ... > make install ... > /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ Fair enough. Fixed. > > One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is > > /usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient? > > It is, but only for Fedora >= 11. Fixed for Fedora <= 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review