Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-04 03:42:44 EDT --- > * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now. I'm aware of it but I'm waiting for the new version of ekiga that will work with it. > * rpmlint on the installed package complains: > > $ rpmlint opal > opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 > /lib64/libdl.so.2 > > This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand? I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now fixed. [perobinson@neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal* ../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [perobinson@neo SPECS]$ > * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc > file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is > considered as file duplication. Removed the extra copy of the licence in devel > * %configure --prefix=/usr > Please use the %{_prefix} macro Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to specify the prefix :-) You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3 http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review