Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #26 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-03 14:01:02 EDT --- Thanks for the report. As it has been a while since I did the review and the package has been updated many times since, I made a quick check about the current status: * There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now. * rpmlint on the installed package complains: $ rpmlint opal opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libdl.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libsasl2.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libssl.so.8 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libz.so.1 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libexpat.so.1 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libresolv.so.2 opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand? * There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is considered as file duplication. * %configure --prefix=/usr Please use the %{_prefix} macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review