Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-03 05:29:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1452145 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. jana.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.5-0.1 ['0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12', '0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41'] ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url 98d622dc60b9fdcd442294311dac8a8cfd9f2242 jana-0.4.5-20090622.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + libjana-ecal.pc,libjana-gtk.pc,libjana.pc files present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package jana-0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12.i586 => Provides: libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 Requires: libORBit-2.so.0 libatk-1.0.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libcairo.so.2 libecal-1.2.so.7 libedataserver-1.2.so.11 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgconf-2.so.4 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libical.so.0 libicalss.so.0 libicalvcal.so.0 libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libsoup-2.4.so.1 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package jana-devel-0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc12.i586 => Provides: pkgconfig(libjana) = 0.0 pkgconfig(libjana-ecal) = 0.0 pkgconfig(libjana-gtk) = 0.0 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libjana-ecal.so.0 libjana-gtk.so.0 libjana.so.0 pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) pkgconfig(libecal-1.2) pkgconfig(libjana) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you don't need BuildRequires: glib2-devel as it will be pulled by gtk2-devel 2) It will be always good to use make install as make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" this will make sure you will keep timestamps of upstream files that are copied as it is. 3) Add documentation like you added for mojito 4) I am not sure whether we can have some more additional subpackages like libjana-gtk and libjana-ecal Do you think we can have them separate? Submit new SRPM with above fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review