Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #12 from IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-02 16:37:39 EDT --- Hi Praveen and Matt, Try Spec URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb.spec SRPM URL: http://ratliff.net/sfcb/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm It has bee updated and it now requires cim-schema as defined in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 for both building and running. It has Provides: cim-server Here are a couple of things that don't feel entirely clean yet: * I removed %{?_smp_mflags} from the make directive because it was causing build failures since later steps depend on earlier steps which hadn't yet completed. * I added sfcbrepos -f statement to %post so that sfcb can find the cim-schema so that adds some time during the install. In OpenSUSE, they add this to the init file instead. It only has to be run once. * The init script is still named sfcb rather than sblim-sfcb which is consistent with upstream and OpenSUSE, but rpmlint complains. * Very likely incorrectly, I added a statement about the static libraries to silence an rpmbuild complaint. Emily -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review