Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-02 05:30:34 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing (In reply to comment #2) > Is there any part of the test suite which could be run > at build time? At least some of the tests don't seem to require a database > server. All the dbapi20 tests seem to require a working db server. The numeric parsing testcase (test_numeric_parse.py) actually fails, for which I've filed a bug upstream. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2815670&group_id=184050&atid=907701 > Why not build the documentation? It's not exactly user-friendly to provide raw > tex source and a Makefile. Converting this seems to be a major PITA. They are in python docs tex dialect requiring tex style definitions from python 2.5 tools that no longer exist for 2.6 and even for 2.5 and F10 were specifically excluded from the fedora packages. The only sane way (without major patching) that I've come up with would require getting these in the buildroot http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/howto.cls http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/pypaper.sty http://svn.python.org/projects/python/branches/release25-maint/Doc/texinputs/python.sty and then pdflatex generating a single pdf. Couldn't get a proper html output with latex2html even with the styles present. There might be a better way using existing in fedora tools, but I can't find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review