[Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260





--- Comment #5 from Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-01 20:22:00 EDT ---
== FULL REVIEW ==

[  OK  ] specfiles match:
    603f646439e75ee959296cb4ec71b153  wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec
    603f646439e75ee959296cb4ec71b153  wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec.1
[  OK  ] source files match upstream:
    b0ecafbc0ccdf226046474aab0d7f7a7  503434057_cets_new_blog_defaults.zip
    b0ecafbc0ccdf226046474aab0d7f7a7  503434057_cets_new_blog_defaults.zip.1
[  OK  ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[  OK  ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[  OK  ] dist tag is present.
[  OK  ] build root is correct.
[  OK  ] license field matches the actual license.
[  OK  ] license is open source-compatible.
[  N/A ] license text included in package.
    License text not provided so not necessary to be in %doc
[  OK  ] latest version is being packaged.
[  N/A ] BuildRequires are proper.
[  N/A ] compiler flags are appropriate.
[  OK  ] %clean is present. 
[  OK  ] package builds in mock.
[  OK  ] package installs properly.
[  N/A ] debuginfo package looks complete.
[FAILED] rpmlint is silent. 
    wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog
1.2.3-1 ['1.2.3-2.fc11', '1.2.3-2']
    You need to add a changelog entry for each update (including the 
    fix-the-description update). Add a changelog entry that you fixed the
    changelog as well and bump it for me to approve this package.
[  OK  ] final provides and requires are sane 
[  N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass:
[  OK  ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[  OK  ] owns the directories it creates.
[  OK  ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[  OK  ] no duplicates in %files.
[  OK  ] file permissions are appropriate.
[  N/A ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. 
[  OK  ] code, not content.
[  OK  ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[  OK  ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[  OK  ] no headers.
[  OK  ] no pkgconfig files. 
[  OK  ] no libtool .la droppings.
[  OK  ] desktop files valid and installed properly.

Not approved, see above

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]