Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #5 from Eelko Berkenpies <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-30 10:14:26 EDT --- [V] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [eelko@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/SRPMS/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm liblastfm.src:41: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [eelko@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [eelko@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-devel-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on liblastfm/liblastfm-libs/libliblastfm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [eelko@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-debuginfo-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [V] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Conclusion: ------------------ APPROVED ------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review