Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-29 19:21:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > * Sun Jun 28 2009 Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> 1.1-3.gitfccbbd6 > - The software has a MIT not BSD license > > SPEC: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope.spec > SRPM: > http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope-1.1-3.gitfccbbd6.fc12.src.rpm Thank you very much for the update. All mentioned issues were addressed: * License: OK - got clarification from the fedora-legal mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-June/msg00045.html - License is MIT according to the COPYING file - License of source files matches actual license (I've roughly scanned over the sources...) - MIT acceptable for Fedora - COPYING file packaged * %description: OK * compilation: OK - package builds now fine in F10 The small problem that it is not possible let the program put its output in an xterm running on the same X-server which is used to connect the clients I would not consider as a major problem. This tool is for debugging anyway and since e.g. logging into a file works fine on the same machine this issue will not hold back the approval. -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review