[Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926





--- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-29 07:40:35 EDT ---
Notes:

* Wrong category for desktop-file-install. It should be "Graphics" instead of
"Development". Easy to fix.

* Since it provides skencil and sketch, I suggest you to add "Obsoletes" for
sketch as well. However, I'm not sure about it, since I cannot remember, did
sketch was included in Fedora or not.

Anyway, here is my 

REVIEW:

- rpmlint is not silent:

[petro@Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc12.i586.rpm
sK1.i586: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sk1/__init__.py 0644
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
[petro@Workplace Desktop]$

This file contains shebang, and therefore rpmlint thinks of its as a script.
Easyfix.

+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The files, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, are
included in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible (as usual for python apps and
libraries).

+/- The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Unfortunately, your URL is wrong. Please fix it

[petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz*
56d4b58d30b52e97dccb81ce157e41c2b6b5f0c0c383b0f4c55bacb317443c84 
sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz
56d4b58d30b52e97dccb81ce157e41c2b6b5f0c0c383b0f4c55bacb317443c84 
sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz.1
[petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture. See koji link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content. 
+ No extra large documentation files.
+ Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly
installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+  At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

Please fix mentioned issues.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]