[Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440


Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>  2009-06-27 06:17:47 EDT ---
* package named in accordance with license guidelines
* source file ok
* builds fine in mock
* filelist sane
* requires/provides make sense, sugar package seems to drag all the required
python stuff

1.) Is there any exception for non-standard groups for Sugar? A non-standard
groub definitely won't block a review, but I'd interested to know

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]