Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2009-06-26 16:04:54 EDT --- I am not a legal expert, but as stated here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses , "all software in Fedora MUST be under licenses in the Fedora licensing list. This list is based on the licenses approved by the Free Software Foundation , OSI and consultation with Red Hat Legal". Debian packagers raised the same type of concerns about licensing of that package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335185 , but they became eventually fine with the re-worded version of the license. It is a custom license, and the author does not appear to be ready to switch to a standard, OSI-approved, license. So, Fedora legal people may not accept that license. I prefer to let them have a look at it and decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review