Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #12 from steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-25 17:13:49 EDT --- I agree with Jussi Lehtola's reasoning that the presence of the dist tag does not serve much of a purpose whereas it's absence would reduce download and update time. I choose to go without the dist tag. The new spec and srpm are below. (note: I've reverted back the release to 1, since the dist tag was the only change and the package isn't an officially 'released' package yet): Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3-pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3-pdf-3.0-1.src.rpm Jochen, sorry for the trouble, but could you please review and re-approve ? cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review