Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Somlo <somlo@xxxxxxx> 2009-06-23 15:36:21 EDT --- also not an official review (yet) :) Installing your drraw-selinux subpackage didn't actually make any difference for me (stock up-to-date f10 install, selinux set to enforcing). The error logged to syslog advised me to run 'sealert -l something', which in turn recommended that I run 'chcon -t bin_t /usr/share/drraw/drraw.cgi', which fixed the issue (again, independently of whether the -selinux subpackage was installed or not). Digging through the selinux packaging wiki link from comment #1, I ended up at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2006-April/msg00115.html which seems to suggest that in your case a subpackage is unnecessary, and all you really need is: %post chcon -t bin_t %{_datadir}/%{name}/drraw.cgi and no need to worry about %postun at all. chcon is part of coreutils, so no need to drag in policycoreutils (probably no need for a -selinux subpackage at all). Once your package gets accepted, file bug against selinux-policy and request that your package be handled (again, as per the wiki page in comment #1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review