Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #9 from Roland Wolters <wolters.liste@xxxxxxx> 2009-06-23 15:11:19 EDT --- Hm, the source is however distributed with the GPL2 license text, and all source files say GPLv2+, so I went for that instead of the text on the homepage. Also, cddaheaderwidget.cpp is GPLv2. So what is the correct license for the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review