Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-23 14:22:54 EDT --- I don't see why not. I've already done most of the review work, so if you want to close this and reopen it later, it shouldn't be a problem. However, I don't see that this package has far to go. Really, the undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints are not so problematic that they'd block this review; this wouldn't be the first package with somewhat bizarre linking requirements. The other stuff shouldn't be a big deal. The python dependency issue might not even be an issue. I'd just like to see some progress being made on the sage packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review